Facts about radiometric dating Chat free collant
The Slingshot argument claims to show that all true statements stand for the same thing - the truth value true.If this argument holds, and facts are taken to be what true statements stand for, then we reach the counter-intuitive conclusion that there is only one fact - the truth.For example, "If Alexander had lived, his empire would have been greater than Rome." This contrasts with an indicative conditional, which indicates what is (in fact) the case if its antecedent is (in fact) true—for example, "If you drink this, it will make you well." Such sentences are important to modal logic, especially since the development of possible world semantics.
Difficulties arise, however, in attempting to identify the constituent parts of negative, modal, disjunctive, or moral facts.
Moral philosophers since David Hume have debated whether values are objective, and thus factual.
Factuality—what has occurred—can also be contrasted with counterfactuality: what might have occurred, but did not.
A counterfactual conditional or subjunctive conditional is a conditional (or "if-then") statement indicating what would be the case if events had been other than they actually are.
Fact is sometimes used synonymously with truth, as distinct from opinions, falsehoods, or matters of taste.